Sources & evidence

Where the record comes from.

Primary documents first. Reporting corroborates; it does not replace.

Justicara reporting is grounded in the documents that constitute the public account — judgments, statutes, gazettes, parliamentary records and official data. Everything published here is sorted into one of three tiers before it can support a claim.

Source hierarchyThree tiers
Tier 01
Primary record — a claim can rest on this alone
Tier 02
Corroborating report — supports, never substitutes
Tier 03
Pointer only — may lead us to a document, is not the evidence
Default
Sources are named and linked wherever the document is public

A report that relies on Tier 02 without a Tier 01 document says so in the text.

What counts as evidence

Three tiers, one standard

The tier decides what a document is allowed to do in a report — not how interesting it is.

Tier 01

Primary record

A claim can rest on this alone.

Documents produced by the institution itself, obtained from the institution's own record.

  • Court judgments, orders and case filings
  • Constitutional text, acts, ordinances and statutory rules
  • Official gazettes and government notifications
  • Parliamentary proceedings, committee records and submissions
  • Election Commission notifications, results and official data
  • Treaty texts and UN human rights mechanism documents
  • Audit reports, commissions of inquiry and regulatory filings

Tier 02

Corroborating report

Supports a primary document. Never substitutes for one.

Established news agencies and rights organisations with published methodology and a correction record of their own.

  • Reuters, Agence France-Presse and Associated Press wire reporting
  • Dawn and comparable Pakistani newspapers of record
  • Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International research
  • International Commission of Jurists legal analysis
  • World Bank and IMF data and country reporting
  • Peer-reviewed legal and social science scholarship

Tier 03

Pointer only

May lead us to a document. Cannot be the evidence.

Material we may follow up but will not build a published claim on, however widely it circulates.

  • Anonymous social media posts and unattributed screenshots
  • Unverified leaked material without a chain of custody
  • Partisan aggregators and advocacy press releases
  • AI-generated summaries of documents we have not read ourselves
  • Single-source claims we cannot independently confirm

Commonly referenced

The institutions behind the documents

These bodies publish the records Justicara reporting most often draws on. Listing them is a description of our reading, not a claim of any relationship with them.

Pakistan

  • SCSupreme Court of Pakistan
  • HCProvincial High Courts
  • NANational Assembly
  • SENSenate of Pakistan
  • ECPElection Commission of Pakistan
  • SBPState Bank of Pakistan
  • FBRFederal Board of Revenue
  • AGPAuditor General of Pakistan

International

  • UNUnited Nations bodies and treaty mechanisms
  • OHCHRUN Human Rights Office
  • ICJInternational Commission of Jurists
  • HRWHuman Rights Watch
  • AIAmnesty International
  • WBWorld Bank
  • IMFInternational Monetary Fund
  • ILOInternational Labour Organization

None of these organisations endorse, fund or review Justicara. They are named solely to identify publicly available records commonly cited in our reporting.

How sources are handled

Rules that apply to every citation

These hold whether a document is a Supreme Court judgment or a single line in a gazette notification.

Citation
Where a document is public, we link to it directly. Where it is not, we say where it came from and why it cannot be linked.
Attribution
Strong characterisations are attributed to the named source that made them. They are not restated as Justicara's own finding.
Translation
Where a source is in Urdu or another language, the original wording governs. Any translation is our own unless stated.
Anonymity
Sources are named by default. Anonymity is granted only where identification carries a credible risk, and the reason is stated.
Gaps
Where a record is missing, sealed or withheld, we report the gap rather than infer what it might contain.

Think we have leaned on the wrong document?

Send the primary source. Scrutiny of our sourcing is welcome and is answered.

Write to the editor
Justicara
Evidence over outrage

Independent analysis of law, institutions, constitutional government and human rights — grounded in primary sources, not noise.

Support Justicara

Follow

© 2026 Justicara — Evidence over outrage. Founded 2026.Public record · Pg. 01